Talk:Long March 7

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rocketry B‑class Mid‑importance

	Rocketry portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Useful info[edit]

http://www.dragoninspace.com/rocketry/cz7.aspx

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Craigboy (talk • contribs) 07:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

10-20 ton payload is referenced to 2010 articles[edit]

10-20 ton payload is referenced to 2010 articles and appears more than once. http://www.space.com/28809-china-rocket-family-moon-plans.html gives 13.5 ton payload. Not clear whether 13.5 is maximum or maiden flight payload that can be varied with other configurations or is the only configuration. Therefore not sure whether and how to change it. crandles (talk) 00:22, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, on paper it has a higher Isp than the Falcon 9, but a lower thrust (7.2MN LM-7 vs 7.6 MN F-9 FT+). The F-9 FT+ is quoted by SpaceX as good for 22 metric tons to LEO, so you'd think that LM-7 would be in approximately the same ball park ~ 95% or so. 147.147.104.39 (talk) 21:10, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures[edit]

Any pictures of this new superb rocket available? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.63.75.136 (talk) 08:12, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would be cool to use a picture of Long March 7a which is 7 meters taller because that's the largest rocket china builds. GlowingLava (talk) 03:14, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Long March 7. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160914060224/http://cmse.gov.cn/news/show.php?itemid=5507 to http://cmse.gov.cn/news/show.php?itemid=5507

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Intro is too long[edit]

I think that the intro is WAY too long with all the abbreviations and other ways of writing. This makes it hard to read, especially in the little wikipedia box when you make a Google search "Long March 7". Any thoughts on how to change it to make it more readable? Cocobb8 (talk) 13:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]