Talk:John Murray (publishing house)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Add external link[edit]

Please add a link to <http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/>, which is editing and publishing all of the correspondence of Charles Darwin. John Murray was a significant correspondent of Darwin. Eadp 14:29, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The JM website link seems to go to something that has nothing to do with the case.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackiespeel (talk • contribs) 17:59, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio[edit]

I have some concerns about today's edits. They seem to have largely copied and pasted content from here:

[1]

Could I ask that the most blatant copyvios be removed? --Mais oui! 19:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I removed all the copyvio material added by user 128.205.150.52 (talk · contribs) but retained the references. — Athænara ✉ 20:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --Mais oui! 08:01, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melville item[edit]

"One must also add that John Murray was one of the first publishers of Herman Melville.After his manuscript of a book based on his adventures in the Marquesas was rejected by Harper and Brothers in New York it was accepted by John Murray in London. This "Narrative of Four Months among the Natives of Valley of the Marquesas Islands" was later published as "Typee" by Wiley and Putman of New York."

The above was added to the John Murray archives section of the article by user 67.164.114.68 (talk · contribs). I moved it here as references which verify it are needed. If it is verified it should perhaps be in a different section. — Athaenara 22:11, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

John Murray the publisher vs. John Murray the publishing house[edit]

Before someone reverts my edit again: I saw that the two have been mixed together here and I don't know how the best way is to fix it. The article talks about both. I've come across other articles that mentioned John Murray either as the publisher or the house and both link here. I've not touch any since this one needs to be fixed first. I don't know how many article link here so is it even possible to fix it? If so I think we should have two separate articles. One on the publisher and one on the publishing house.--Nocturnalsleeper (talk) 13:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure the distinction is meaningful. What was the legal status of the publishing house? If it was a corporation, then we may be able to write on it; but if it was a partnership, or the property of John Murray Sr. or Jr., what is there to say? It was, at any given time, what the living John Murray was doing, and no more. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:22, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Until its takeover, John Murray Publishers was as far as I know (speaking as a former Editor under John Murray VII) always a private family-owned firm headed by the contemporarily senior John Murray (generally with his successor-to-be in a more junior position) as a full-time occupation. Because of this, contemporary references to "John Murray" often meant the publishing house or the individual interchangeably, because the business-related activities of the two were indistinguishable. I'm not aware that any of the seven John Murrays were notable for any activities unconnected with their primary positions, so to me it makes sense to subsume the individuals within their business. 87.81.230.195 (talk) 13:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on John Murray (publisher). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070611055643/http://www.nls.uk/jma/mss/search/index.cfm to http://www.nls.uk/jma/mss/search/index.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs. This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 May 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Pages moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jerm (talk) 17:17, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– As has been previously mentioned (in 2008 and 2009, above at Talk:John Murray (publisher)#John Murray the publisher vs. John Murray the publishing house), anyone researching the publishing house or the generational publishers named "John Murray", will almost certainly type "John Murray" and sort it out at the disambiguation page, rather than type "John Murray (1778–1843)" or "John Murray III". The use of stand-alone vital dates as a qualifier should only appear as a last resort when no other disambiguation can be found, which does not seem to be the case here. As for John Murray (publisher), it should redirect to John Murray#Literature. — Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:26, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support "Publisher" is an ambiguous term. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.