Talk:Janet Malcolm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Morally indefensible[edit]

Do we have a citation for this quote: "The central thesis of The Journalist and the Murderer is that, as Malcolm put it, "every journalist knows that what he does is morally indefensible." "

And did she actually call this act of McGinnis's morally indefensible? "McGinniss's "morally indefensible" act, in Malcolm's view, was to pretend that he believed MacDonald was innocent, even after he became convinced of his guilt ..." SlimVirgin (talk) 20:44, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

Quotation from Masson's Website[edit]

Masson was the subject of a two-part profile in The New Yorker (December 5, 12, 1983) by Janet Malcolm, later published in book form: In the Freud Archives (New York: Knopf, 1984), which were the subject of a libel suit filed by Masson. After decisions by the United States Supreme Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, favorable to Masson, a trial against Malcolm and the New Yorker was held in 1993 in federal court in San Francisco. Masson won the trial, but the jury deadlocked on damages. A new trial, without the New Yorker, was held in San Francisco in September, 1994. Masson lost.

The quotation is from page 3, which as it turns out is the first page of text and the first paragraph of "The Journalist and the Murderer," Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 1990. It is most often quoted at a slightly longer length, as here:

"Every journalist who is not too stupid or too full of himself to notice what is going on knows that what he does is morally indefensible. He is a kind of confidence man, preying on people's vanity, ignorance, or loneliness, gaining their trust and betraying them without remorse."

There is of course no concordance to Janet Malcolm's work, so it is difficult to say with certainty, without doing a close reading, whether or not she said that McGinniss had committed morally indefensible acts. You could say that the paragraph above answers the question -- he's a journalist and therefore.... And by transposing this to the broadest readership, she accused every journalist, which no doubt caused the nasty reaction by many journalists to what she had written. On the other hand, to doubt Janet Malcolm’s fairness of treatment of any subject is probably not possible by anyone who has read her books, and it should be noted that in 1998 "The Journalist and the Murderer" was chosen as one of the twentieth century’s 100 best non-fiction books in English, by members of the board of the Modern Library, a division of Random House.

In the June 21, 2001, issue of The New York Review of books, she published, “Justice to J. D. Sallinger,” in which she looks at the dismissive stance that many well-know critics have taken toward Sallinger, a writer that she greatly admires. It is available free on the web. In addition, she has published a number of reviews of photography books in The New York Review.

It should also be posted, perhaps, that Janet Malcolm has been publishing pieces in The New Yorker magazine in recent years on the lives of Gertrude Stein and Alice B. Toklas. A “Contributors” note to one of these pieces (Life and Letters: “Strangers in Paradise,” by Janet Malcolm, The New Yorker magazine, November 13, 2006, pp 54-61.) reports that a show of her collages is on view at Lori Bookstein Fine Art, in New York. Janet Malcolm’s sister is Marie Winn, well-known for her book about the hawks in Central Park, “Red-Tails in Love,” Pantheon, 1998. 74.32.45.50 20:01, 14 November 2006 (UTC) leov10571@yahoo.com[reply]

Where are citations to Malcolm's New Yorker articles about Masson?[edit]

The trial between Masson and Malcolm was over the publication in The New Yorker of one or more articles by Janet Malcolm about Jeffrey Masson.

How can this article neglect to cite them? If anyone can please include their citations, it would distinctly improve the article. It is absurd that this article does not refer the interested reader to the textual material most relevant to that trial!Daqu (talk) 23:01, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Janet Malcolm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"original [sic] New Yorker"?[edit]

In this sentence, "Malcolm's second husband was long-time New Yorker editor Gardner Botsford,[5] a member of the family that had funded the original [sic] New Yorker." What do you mean by "original [sic]"? No mention of it in the WP article or in the accounts of the founding of the NY that I have read. Please clarify (or delete this superfluous adjective). Autodidact1 (talk) 03:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Autodidact1, the source cited refers to Harold Ross, which concurs with the WP entry on the origins of the magazine. I have rephrased and hope it is clearer. Innisfree987 (talk) 03:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for making the change, but I still don't understand why you are saying "original [sic]". Why is it necessary? The magazine was funded once. Autodidact1 (talk) 05:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Janet_Malcolm&oldid=1208363473"