Talk:History of banking in China

China High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from History of banking in China appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 August 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the piaohao and the qianzhuang were financial institutions in ancient China?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/August.

Wikipedia

Incredibly bad sourcing - expert needed[edit]

Substantial portions of this article turn out to be sourced to, literally, undergraduate essays written by an intern at a heterodox economic think tank promoting fringe Austrian economics.

I could remove them - but large chunks of coverage from the early 20th century would disappear.

Do we have an expert who can look these over? - David Gerard (talk) 20:09, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I found the 2019 edit that added 50kb of text based, literally, on two undergraduate essays in a crank economics blog. I've reverted to the previous text. The article is way skimpier now, but at least it isn't being used to push a WP:FRINGE POV based on grossly unreliable sources - David Gerard (talk) 20:14, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]