Talk:Hey Mama (Kanye West song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHey Mama (Kanye West song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHey Mama (Kanye West song) is part of the Late Registration series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 9, 2019Articles for deletionMerged
November 25, 2021Good article nomineeListed
September 21, 2022Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on December 14, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Kanye West recorded "Hey Mama" five years before its release on his 2005 album Late Registration?
Current status: Good article

Untitled[edit]

The information for this entry states that the sample for Hey Mama is Today Won't Come Again by the Kay-Gees. The Kay-Gees do not have a song by that name. Instead, the song title is Today Won't Come Again but it is by Donal Leace. A comparison of the two songs can be found at http://www.whosampled.com/sample/view/309/Kanye%20West-Hey%20Mama_Donal%20Leace-Today%20Won%27t%20Come%20Again/. WayTooTall (talk) 18:44, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hey Mama (Kanye West song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hey Mama (Kanye West song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:31, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Hey Mama (Kanye West song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: FormalDude (talk · contribs) 07:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hi @Kyle Peake, happy to be reviewing this GA nomination. I'll provide updates here periodically as I review the article. ––FormalDude talk 07:21, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will post my recommendations as to what is needed to bring the article up to standard for each section below.

FormalDude Thanks for the review, I have addressed everything... is it time to place this on hold or pass? --K. Peake 21:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

  • Remove comma from first sentence.
  •  Not done this is the correct way for introduction of an album that a song is on --K. Peake 16:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Remove "who got in contact through Rick Rubin" as undue.
  •  Done

Background[edit]

  • Move the last sentence of the first paragraph to the beginning.

Composition and lyrics[edit]

  • Change the first appearance of "Donda" to "Donda West" and clarify that it is Kanye's mother.
  • The source for "West tries to force rhymes at points" does not verify that claim.
  •  Done added an alternative sentence --K. Peake 09:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Release and reception[edit]

  • Start new paragraph after sentence two.
  •  Not done what's the point of having a para with nothing but the release date and a one sentence critical overview, which would not be backed up until the following para if I complied with this move? --K. Peake 09:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move the final paragraph to the beginning.
  •  Not done critical reception before commercial is the way I've done for all my GAs and I see no opposing guideline --K. Peake 09:45, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • No need for brackets for the "[t]he Brion redux" quote per MOS:QUOTATIONS.
  • Create subsection "Commercial performance" for the final paragraph.

Live performances[edit]

  • Consider splitting up into multiple paragraphs.

Appearances in media[edit]

  • No comma for: The video features archival footage, showing the Wests rapping "Hey Mama" together.
  •  Done while rewording so this flows smoother --K. Peake 16:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Credits and personnel[edit]

  • No changes needed.

Missing sections/content[edit]

  1. Cover versions - The song has been covered by Vitamin String Quartet and others (Rockabye Baby!, The Gold Soul All Stars).
  •  Not done I did look through the Google results for all of these, but none have enough coverage to meet WP:SONGCOVER. --K. Peake 21:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Promotion/marketing - In order to meet criteria 3, broad in its coverage.
  •  Comment: this type of information is already included to a healthy extent with live performances and in parts of appearances in media, so isn't it broad enough despite not all being in the same section? --K. Peake 21:54, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Kyle Peake: I still think there should probably be a promotion/marketing section that covers when/how the song was first released, first performed, advertising, etc. ––FormalDude talk 22:02, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Release/promotion should not all be in the same section when there's large amounts of live performances, as well as promo that classifies as media appearances (not all of those are from West himself); it is all organized within appropriate sections and there's no guideline specifically for release and promotion so I don't see any problem. --K. Peake 22:06, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Final Review[edit]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:48, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by Kyle Peake (talk). Self-nominated at 07:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Article passed for GA within the past seven days (November 25, 2021). It is well-written, sourced, no copyvios seen (7.4%).
  • All the hooks are interesting and cited. The article meets the required length. QPQ done. This is ready to go. Great work! Damian Vo (talk) 08:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
ALT0 to T:DYK/P3