Talk:Havoc (2005 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

ménage_à_trois??[edit]

Why does this omit the debate about the image of members of one race &/or class taunting those of another race f/ the fright|thrill??

Use of the word latino to exclude Italy is a geographic misconception.

[[ hopiakuta Please do sign your signature on your message. ~~ Thank You. -]] 09:30, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Havoc poster.jpg[edit]

Image:Havoc poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What changes did Gaghan make to Kaplan's script in his re-write?[edit]

Is 'The Powers that Be' available to be read anywhere? Jessica Kaplan only gets the story credit (a default credit regardless of how totally different the new script is), so it must have been a huge alteration to have denied her actual co-writer credit on the final script. The final story itself seems rather bizarre: that white teenagers obsessed with hip hop and black gang culture would gravitate to Hispanic gangs. I'm wondering if the original script involved black gangs and Gaghan changed it to be more politically correct. Think about it. Hispanic gangs in LA do not listen to black hip hop. And when they get arrested and put in jail, they do not socialize with black gangs or black culture. And when I lived in Vegas in the Hispanic ghetto going to college, I saw a great many young white underage girls at parties thrown by black gang bangers and wannabees. I never saw pretty underage white girls hanging with the Hispanic gangs or at their sex & drug parties. Not once. And again, this was IN THE HISPANIC GHETTO... where, if it was ever going to happen the other way around, it would have happened there. Switching it from black gangs to Hispanic gangs, even with the incongruous aspect of hip hop culture still preserved, seems exactly like the sort of Hollywood-izing of a more authentic script that I could see someone like Gaghan doing to make it more bankable and less controversial than it needed to be... especially since he's not a black director who might more easily get away with it like Spike Lee. Anyone know? I also remember reading somewhere when the film was released that the original Kaplan script had a harsher ending. 71.65.115.103 (talk) 07:42, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Havoc (2005 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090622072854/http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Havoc to http://www.filmcritic.com/misc/emporium.nsf/reviews/Havoc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:17, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]