A fact from Hamamatsu Chūnagon Monogatari appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 May 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the first chapter of Hamamatsu Chūnagon Monogatari, an eleventh-century Japanese tale, no longer exists?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 04:22, May 9, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
I see that Kubota has been "ported" over to the bibliography. However, I was the one who used it in the article that it was ported from, so the question remains: was it really used in the creation of the article? Regardless, I have Kubota so can confirm that Hamamatsu is in fact covered. It's also in the much more more complete Nihon Koten Bungaku Daijiten. I have read much of the original text which I added. I am rather busy at the moment, but I will try to add some content and citations to the article in the near future. Bendono (talk) 05:03, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Strike that. I see where it is being used now. My mistake. Bendono (talk) 05:04, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I thought it would be good to give the same 'what is the Mumyozoshi' here as we did in Torikaebaya, so I moved over the reference. Thanks for putting in a Japanese edition of the text for further reading, for the interwiki link (which I could never have found on my own) and for the tip-off about the NKBD. :) --Malkinann (talk) 07:41, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]