Talk:Fort Knox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lazy cut and paste jobs[edit]

I'm not allowing lazy cut and paste jobs into this article. Period. Do your own writing! Stevie is the man! TalkWork 06:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dumping a bunch of unwikified text here and expecting others to clean it up is unacceptable, no matter the source. Also, even if public domain text is usable, it must be *factored* into the existing article, something that was not done. Also, the existing content (that many people had worked on) was removed in the process. I don't see a serious effort here to create a good article, and until it becomes serious, I'm fighting it. Stevie is the man! TalkWork 14:26, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article appears to contain several articles from the fort knox website pretty much word for word. I'll see what I can do to shape this one up. Just maybe I'll include some references. Jahnx 04:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Fort Knox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:23, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fort Knox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Digital photo featuring mannequin labeled as photo from the 1940s[edit]

Hello wikipedians, I have found out that a digital photo showing a mannequin in a tank labeled as it being taken in the 1940s. Note the unusally high quality. I personally think that it was a photo showing what was described, but it was not able to be used under creative commons liscensces. Please change, Thank you for your time. 98.181.69.7 (talk) 13:37, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typically, federal government images can be used in articles as much as CC-licensed ones, as they are considered public domain. Also, high-quality color photographs could be made in the 1940s, although it was expensive and the process was slow. As you may well know, the U.S. military easily had the resources to have photos like this made. On top of that, I don't see any images in this article with a mannequin, unless you are mistaking a human being for one. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 18:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]