Talk:Folger Shakespeare Library

United States: District of Columbia Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as Low-importance).

Theatre Mid‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Shakespeare Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Libraries Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Teaching Shakespeare Institute was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 21 May 2016 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Folger Shakespeare Library. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Untitled[edit]

I have been told that the Folger Shakespeare Library somehow holds performance rights to the plays of William Shakespeare, and you are required to get their written permission if performing a Shakespeare play that is in any way altered or changed from the original. Is this true? -Toptomcat 14:50, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Someone's pulling your leg. He's been dead over 400 years, that so falls in the copyright-free range. Molière plays are copyright-free, and he died more than 50 years after Shakespeare. If it were true, than the library's owed like a bajillion dollars. But unless there's been some radical shift in copyright law that I've not heard about, you can perform straight off or altered versions of da Bard's plays to your heart's content. --Ebyabe 16:07, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I knew all that and said it to 'em, but they were very insistant, and had been working in theater longer than I have.

[80s cartoon show]Wikipedia: combating cluelessness one person at a time. Thanks, Ebyabe! [/80s cartoon show] -Toptomcat 13:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome. Back in the day, some friends and I were going to start a community theater. I figured the best way to start would be the royalty-free route (Shakespeare, Molière, etc.) until we could afford to pay copyrights. Also did enough mangled versions of the Bard, as knowing others who've done them. Like a kiddie musical version of Midsummer Night's Dream, or a Western version of one of the Henry plays (I get them confused, but think it was IV) with Falstaff and Pistol in a bar. Get it? Pistol? :) I actually think I got quite good at Bardic text condensation. Good luck with your troupe, and break a leg. And twist an arm or two if you have to, but nicely. :) --Ebyabe 14:36, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Theatre arm[edit]

Does anyone else think it's odd that the theatre part of the library isn't given more discussion in the article? It seems to me that the plays produced there get by far the most attention from the general public, but maybe my impression is skewed because I see one or two plays a year there. I'll probably try to add some more information about the theatre in the near future, unless there's some objection or someone else wants to do it. Propaniac 00:33, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 15:29, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some edits under the conflict of interest guidelines[edit]

Following the wikipedia conflict of interest (COI) guidelines, I wanted to note that I am a freelance writer, editor, and consultant who often works for the Folger Shakespeare Library. They have asked me to take a look at this article, which has been flagged by wikipedia users as needing cleanup and attention to tone.

I have described this in more detail on my User:Fabfacts user page but wanted to note it here as well.

I have just made two initial edits directly to the article which I hope are noncontroversial: correcting the year and details of when the land for the library was identified and purchased, and adding the name of Henry Clay Folger's wife. She was previously mentioned but with no name given.

I will make a separate note here for each additional edit or requested edit going forward.

--EFerington 16:38, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my statement on my conflict of interest at the beginning of this section.

I have now deleted or edited some non-neutral passages from the article. I have also revised the opening section to more closely resemble similar text in the "Morgan Library" and "Huntington Library" articles.

Here are some examples of the language I deleted or edited (all true, but none neutral in tone). These are from throughout the article.

Folger Shakespeare Library is a center for scholarship, learning, culture, and the arts.

internationally recognized...national leader...award-winning producer

Folger Shakespeare Library’s cultural and arts programs – theater, poetry, music, exhibits, and lectures – connect broader audiences to its collections and support the living legacy of Shakespeare in contemporary life.

The revisions to the intro section, in addition to the above cuts, now include a brief mention of the founding and opening of the library (similar to the Morgan Library article), based on information mentioned later in the article, and also move up statements about the endowment, trustees, and historic registry of buildings that were previously listed later in the article.

--EFerington 18:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my statement on my conflict of interest (COI) at the beginning of this section.

I have deleted the clean-up and tone flags at the opening of the article, as I hope I have now addressed both points.

I added short sections on Architecture and Collection to match similar sections in the Morgan Library article. I think it's important for any major library entry to include those sections, but I tried to give only basic info on each topic. There is much more I could add about each, but given my conflict of interest I thought it was best to hope that other wikipedians will take it from there.

I also added a little more info on the founding of the library and expanded Activities (which I had previously shortened by cutting non-neutral language) by adding publications and Folger Institute (academic) activities. Finally, I have added a number of links (cross-references within the article) to other wikipedia articles and have also included references for the added information.

I think this wraps up my main work on the article, although I hope to add some additional references and will no doubt think of a few tweaks or spot some typos -- in which case I will note that (more briefly!) here.

--EFerington 15:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edits generally look good to me. Though, the "activities" section has no citations. I think it needs one in at least one spot, as noted in the article. Something else the article really needs is more pictures. That's all I can think of now. --Aude (talk) 15:46, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much. I have added a citation for the Helen Hayes Awards as you requested. The images sound like a good idea and I will check on that. Thanks again --EFerington (talk) 17:50, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Theater, or the theater?[edit]

Just a note; I visited the page after getting my season tickets. The architecture section link to Elizabethan Theatre is to an article about theater in England in Elizabethan times, not an article about what the institution on East Capitol Street called on its stationery the Folger Theater (not "the Elizabethan Theater"). (There's no page under "Folger Theater," either.) --- OtherDave (talk) 02:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Folger Shakespeare Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141219190421/http://www.folger.edu/template.cfm?cid=791 to http://www.folger.edu/template.cfm?cid=791

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]