Talk:Fantasy cricket
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Authenticity doubtful. Too many references to a commercial site.
However some of the points noted - court orders, websites that offer free samples for illustration purposes and in-depth notes about the current status of the legality of Fantasy Cricket are reasonably genuine. Article needs a definite cleanup and clear delineation of commercial content (which could be removed or if deemed useful can be kept in the reference URLs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.140.212.2 (talk) 06:28, 8 August 2016 (UTC)