Talk:Europa Lander

Spaceflight Low‑importance

	Spaceflight portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astronomy: Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Europa Lander (NASA). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170126025141/https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/docs/10_Europa%20Lander%20Study_L.%20Prockter.pdf to https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/docs/10_Europa+Lander+Study_L.+Prockter.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://zimmer.csufresno.edu/~fringwal/w08a.jup.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 September 2020[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved and will then delete the disambiguation page. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:33, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

– I believe the proposed NASA mission is the primary topic at this point given that the Russian mission evolved into a different mission (Laplace-P that does not involve Europa). Thus this seems to be a case of WP:PRIMARYRED (though there is currently no red link for the Russian mission concept). Mdewman6 (talk) 19:39, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rreagan007 (talk) 22:33, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Since there is only one other article on the disambig page, and that mission was only named Europa Lander for two years ending in 2011. It would be reasonable to just move the page and not even create the Europa Lander (disambiguation) page and instead just use {{About}} at the top of the Europa Lander article to reference the Laplace-P article. Terasail ^[Talk] 16:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support first but a disambiguation page is not required. Delete Europa Lander (disambiguation) and use a hatnote to disambiguate. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.