Talk:Deeper Than Rap

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sales[edit]

I wouldn't call 40,000 units less "substantially lower" than Trilla's sales. In today's sales climate I'd say those are pretty nice numbers. DuckieMcGoose (talk) 16:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

'13 Million' Quote[edit]

I think it's fair to leave his quote about how his album will sell 13 million in. He said it, it's true that he did. Erasing something an artist said about their album just because it makes them look like a moron is not acceptable.

"It has only been 2 months of course he hasn't sold 13 million" you say, but he is currently number 40 after that amount of time selling only a few thousand a week, he is NOT going to magically sell 12.64 million copies anytime soon. --216.17.75.89 ([[User talk:216.17.75.89|talk]]) 13:32, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh guess what? I looked up the figures. Looks like Officer Ricky only sold 315,900 units. I have sourced it to a factual page, so you CAN'T remove it. If you do, it will be reverted, by me, by others, or probably by an automated bot. Because it is factually sourced, relevant to the page, and you are just going to have to accept that. Facts are facts, and I don't go onto John Lennon's page and erase that he was shot to death in an effort to 'bring him back to life.' So you can just learn to live with the reality of Officer Ricky's album sales. --216.17.75.89 (talk) 13:44, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Em release FIVE top forty hits in a month, singles-wise. Ross' last single got to 96! That's just sad... especially since he pulled out all his celebrity friends on that one. Kanye and Jeezy couldn't get that song barely over 100! See if they ever guest on his stuff again. Look how many guests he has on his album, trying to sell it! Tell me he would have even got to 315,900 without that 50 beef?!?!? HE wouldn't have. 50 straight sold all but a few of his wack disc. --216.17.75.89 (talk) 13:51, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Erase this or the cited factual information in the article again, Officer Ricky fan, and you will be recommended for banning. And since it will just be immediately reverted anyway, don't waste your time. --216.17.75.89 (talk) 14:39, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to know why people STILL try to erase this! STOP! --216.17.75.89 (talk) 13:45, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


People need to stop taking this section out. They aren't even giving reasons. --216.17.75.89 (talk) 14:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

I edited out "403,000 copies sold to date" because there isn't a link provided to back up the statement. I added in "has sold more than 382,000 copies to date" and provided two accurate links which verify the quote. Obviously the album has sold more than 382,000 since October, which is why i worded it "sold more than". How much exactly? We don't know. And until someone provides an accurate source verifying as much we should keep it as is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thetruth86 (talkcontribs) 13:22, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE:[edit]

Opps forgot to sign my comment, LOL my bad. Thetruth86 (talk 13:28, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Deeper Than Rap. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:11, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]