Talk:Biretta

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

doctoral biretta[edit]

There are variations in the doctoral biretta. The 4th ridge is the essential difference. The piping/tuft is apparently optional, although I suppose anyone who went out of their way to get one would get the colored options too.[1] The only link a google search for "licentiate biretta" gives is a store, which only has it available with blue tuft/piping for all subjects.[2] Gimmetrow 04:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Peakless Corner[edit]

Does anybody know why the flat side goes on the left? There must be some reason.72.227.136.130 23:48, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I can't say with certainty that this is where it came from, but as birettas are used it is practical: One generally holds the birreta by one of the peaks or blades (grasp it between the index and middle fingers). Because most people are right handed, it is easiest to put a biretta on with a peak to the wear's right. Now if someone hands him his biretta it means that the person presenting it to him has to have a peak facing himself, and a peak facing the wearer. Since the biretta is usually give to the wearer by someone to his side (shoulder to shoulder) the only way the works out consistently is to have the middle peak to the right. So if I am handing you a biretta from the left, I hold it by the back peak, the middle peak is facing you--for you to take it by--, and the empty spot is to my left. You reach over with your right hand, take it by the middle peak and put it on your head--empty spot to your left. If I am handing it to you from the right, I hold it by the front peak, the middle peak is facing you--for you to take it by--, and the empty spot is to my right. Again you reach over with your right hand, take it by the middle peak, which is facing you, and put it on, and again the empty spot is to your left. Like I said, I don't know that this is the origin, but it does work out well in practice. 76.5.80.182 (talk)

Tuftless birettas[edit]

Do deacons'/seminarians' birettas have the pom?

The reason for the flat side on the left, is because the Priest/seminarian elevates the biretta off the head with the right hand, during doxologies and the name of Our Lord.

In answer to the seccond question: Seminarians, Sub-Deacons, Deacons and Priests wear the same kind of biretta. So they will have Tufts, or not, depending on the type they wear.

(Reminder: Cardinals' birettas are tuftless as well.)

Userbox anyone?[edit]

This user knows a Biretta is different from a Beretta

:) - Gobeirne (talk) 07:35, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kudos! -- Secisek (talk) 07:47, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

need one? you can buy a good one at this web site http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=30009010&id=94300045 "the best ever" according to the FSSP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.168.214.144 (talk) 03:39, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

academic biretta outranked by prelatial one[edit]

OK, there is the reference to academic biretta. It is no longer to be used by a priest who has reached a prelatial rank (cardinal or bishop). (I don't know the source, but I do remember reading that.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.63.16.20 (talk) 20:30, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Biretta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060510184817/http://nmsantos.com:80/Teresa.html to http://nmsantos.com/Teresa.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:51, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Vescovo Edik Baroni.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:52, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]