Talk:Attractive nuisance doctrine
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Criticism[edit]
Where is the criticism section for the article? Are there not any legal scholars that have criticized the law on some grounds? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.112.56.132 (talk) 07:10, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Unreferenced[edit]
Not that I doubt the accuracy of the article's materials. However, for law concepts, it would be best if references are provided - so that whoever is interested in look it up for further information. Thanks! Regards, --Hurricane111 00:35, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
Added some refernces to the restatement of torts second. --ozoneliar 18:09, 14 July (UTC)
Advice, not fact[edit]
Currently the article says:
"All landowners should carry appropriate Public liability insurance"
This seems like a piece of legal advice, rather than a factual matter that one would expect in an encyclopedia.
Ordinary Person (talk) 05:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
Only those 7 states?[edit]
The article lists 7 US states which follow the restatement of torts standard. It is unclear whether that means:
- Attractive nuisance only applies in those 7 states; or,
- Attractive nuisance applies in all states, but the standards defined by restatements of torts applies only in those 7 states.
I would appreciate if anyone could clarity. 38.109.87.242 (talk) 15:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)