Talk:Attachment therapy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleAttachment therapy was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 9, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
April 9, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
October 22, 2008Good article nomineeListed
December 3, 2008Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Attachment therapy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:51, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Template[edit]

The Controversy NPOV template meets the 2nd and 3rd criteria for removal: "It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given;" and "In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant." In fact,the Talk page for this article has no discussion of the NPOV issue at all. I propose removing it. Mapping Data (talk) 01:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Outdated and factually inaccurate[edit]

I find this article to contain information that is no longer accurate regarding the treatment for attachment disorders in children. Most of the examples of ‘abusive’ therapy/treatment are from the 90s and early 00s, and things have changed since them. Mental health professionals no longer recommend any of therapies described in the article for kids who were adopted or came from the foster care system due to liabilities to cause injury to a child. 2600:1702:3800:3C10:65A8:56F2:FC6F:56EC (talk) 15:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Overall thoroughness and diagnostic criteria[edit]

I think with the recent updates to this article, its pretty thorough and explains many topics on attachment therapy. It talks about the history of attachment therapy, and how that has changed with modern resources. I think the diagnostic criteria paragraph could have been stronger. It is important to note that attachment therapy is a more alternative therapy, and the physical aspect of it is more outdated and rarely used. This physical aspect of attachment therapy is not necessary and can be approached in a different way. We can still teach children how to feel safe, trusting, and comfortable with others in a more mainstream setting. MalloryJoy (talk) 17:23, 24 September 2023 (UTC) Mallory Ball[reply]