Talk:Abelisaurus

A fact from Abelisaurus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 October 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Abelisaurus had a lighter skull than other dinosaurs due to large fenestrations behind its eyes?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/October.

Wikipedia

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Duh[edit]

Is it really necessary to say that Abelisaurus is an abelisaurid dinosaur, because given the name "Abelisaurus" I'd say it's fairly obvious to even the most uninformed reader. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.36.148.242 (talk) 00:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not all readers will know that Abelisaurids exist, let alone that Abelisaurus is the namesake of the group. MMartyniuk (talk) 12:25, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing Dinoworld[edit]

In this documentary, the head of the abelisaur is feathered. There are some other jarring errors in this so-called 'accurate' sci-doc, but that one stood out to me. Should the higher level article reflect that ceratosauria are not thought to have developed feathers? 50.111.33.78 (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we don't know, and no reliable sources cover this, so we can't do anything. FunkMonk (talk) 19:06, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Athhhhhóooooooóoooooóooo[edit]

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATHOS! 177.126.46.255 (talk) 17:38, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]