Talk:2019 World Athletics Championships – Men's marathon/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 17:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the {{done}} tag to state when something is addressed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)}

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Immediate Failures[edit]

It is a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria -
It contains copyright infringements -
It has, or needs, cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include{{cleanup}}, {{POV}}, {{unreferenced}} or large numbers of {{citation needed}}, {{clarify}}, or similar tags. (See also {{QF-tags}}). -
It is not stable due to edit warring on the page. -

Links[edit]

Prose[edit]

Lede[edit]

2:10:40 - perhaps mention this is in hours, as this could be any timescale.Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed on first use for clarity, but as H:MM:SS is acceptable under the MOS, I have left the rest. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 20:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
30 KM, is this 30 km into the race, or 30 to go? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Clarified as "After 30 kilometres (19 mi).."}} Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 20:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
presumably the race also took place on 6 October 2019? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:01, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair point, clarified in the infobox. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 20:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

General[edit]

preparing for the Ineos 1:59 Challenge.- is this covered by ref 8? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, the source doesn't mention it by name, but it says "Eliud Kipchoge, the Olympic champion, is preparing to go under two hours in Vienna". Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 20:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
rest of preview is good, but is "preview" the right word? Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- It's what was the standard for these, but I agree that it doesn't quite encapsulate it; would "Background" be an improvement, do you reckon. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 20:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Background isn't quite right either, but its better than preview. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:11, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Review meta comments[edit]

I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:42, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- There's one comment I made but it's not important to stop a promotion. Well done. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:12, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Cheers Lee Vilenski, you missed out the ~~~~~ in the {{GA}} on the article talk page. Harrias ^{(he/him) • talk} 08:03, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]