Talk:2009 Nobel Peace Prize

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Misleading / wrongful exposition on the nomination procedure[edit]

The first sentence seems to imply that the Committee is bound by nominations from “others”, when in fact the Committee can itself nominate (even after the Februay 1st deadline). Objections to correcting this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.83.178 (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Our Nobel Peace Prize article doesn't confirm this. Do you have reliable sources for your believe?TMCk (talk) 23:06, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes the Nobel Peace Prize article confirms it, read just after the bullet points under “Nomination” and you will see the statement with a reference to http://nobelpeaceprize.org/en_GB/nomination_committee/who-can-nominate/ . Yet another source: http://nobelpeaceprize.org/en_GB/nomination_committee/selection-process/ , first two sentences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.240.48.195 (talk) 21:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Got it and changed it. Thanks.TMCk (talk) 21:54, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When exactly was Barack Obama Nominated? He received the award only 12 days after he took office.He must have been nominated long before that. Long before he did anything. Long before he won the election. There should be some clarity about that since his nomination was clearly a public relations effort leading up to the election. If he was nominated, what for? He had done nothing to warrant it at that time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.89.229.157 (talk) 14:26, 29 July 2018 

(UTC)

Recommend adding that even though Lundestad said it didn't have the desired effect, widespread media coverage saying they regretted giving the award to Obama or wanted to revoke it were incorrect and that Lundestad clarified against this. https://www.snopes.com/news/2014/09/14/prize-fight/ —Smithryanallen —Preceding undated comment added 13:24, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Statement with reference 62 is misleading since https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/oct/09/reaction-obamas-nobel-prize-varies/ states mostly mixed reactions.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on 2009 Nobel Peace Prize. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 October 2019[edit]

Remove Kensternation's edit, given that it offers personal views. The Nobel lecture section repeats parts of the opening paragraphs. Wadledo (talk) 00:34, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wish I could get a Nobel Peace Prize for doing nothing. Must be that black privilege. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:FB1:530:65BA:67BD:E883:7475 (talk) 00:58, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:19, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 November 2020[edit]

This article is factually incorrect. Obama increased the number of troops in Afghanistan considerably, stating the opposite is a down right lie. Tomkat321 (talk) 12:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Seagull123 Φ 13:15, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 May 2023[edit]

Change "Russian prime minister Dmitry Medvedev said the award will encourage warmer U.S.–Russian relations, and he hoped it would "serve as an additional incentive" for both governments to foster a better "climate in world politics"." to "Russian president Dmitry Medvedev said the award will encourage warmer U.S.–Russian relations, and he hoped it would "serve as an additional incentive" for both governments to foster a better "climate in world politics"."

  • Medvedev served as the president of Russia between 2008 and 2012. 108.41.58.70 (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Done with a phrase change. --Pinchme123 (talk) 20:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2009_Nobel_Peace_Prize&oldid=1196548113"