User talk:Ram Dhaneesh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 08:16, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot Rasnaboy. Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Salem, Tamil Nadu into Geography of Salem. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 11:42, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Translation request[edit]

https://ta.wikipedia.org/s/8usc Please translate this page from Tamil to English.

Request move[edit]

Hi, iam Karan. Just iam trying to add Salem Spartans team logo on Tamil Wikipedia, but it is shows red link, due to the file in English Wikipedia, can any one move the File:Salem Spartans logo.png to Wikimedia commons]]. I2karankiran (talk) 07:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@I2karankiran:, you already placed a request on help desk, I can't move the file, respective user may respond your queries, please be patient untill someone response. Thank you. Dhaneesh 💙 Ram 07:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Sir I2karankiran (talk) 07:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Editor's Barnstar
For your kind and good faith edits on Wikipedia I2karankiran (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 06:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ISKCON Temple, Salem for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ISKCON Temple, Salem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Temple, Salem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 11:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of SRP International Stadium for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article SRP International Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SRP International Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 11:54, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts[edit]

This has been already explained to you by others, at your old user account User talk:தனீஷ்#Multiple_accounts. Please follow the instructions at WP:SOCKLEGIT and WP:SOCK#NOTIFY and disclose your old accounts on your user page. User:Ram Dhaneesh Venkat TL (talk) 10:18, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Venkat TL: My old account is not in use now. So you don't worry about this. Already I gave explanation to admins. Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 12:10, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Where? Please add this information on your user page of the new account. Venkat TL (talk) 12:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Venkat TL: Hey, are you mad, This is my new account. First find out what my new account is. Do not waste my time. Get lost. Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 13:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mind your language. Behave. Venkat TL (talk) 13:49, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Venkat TL: I know how to behave with mad peoples like you. I didn't like give anymore explanation to you. You are not much worth also. Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 13:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/தனீஷ், where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Venkat TL (talk) 14:07, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Venkat TL:You can do whatever you want. I am not afraid. I do not currently use both accounts. Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 14:14, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Geography of Salem, Tamil Nadu for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Geography of Salem, Tamil Nadu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Geography of Salem, Tamil Nadu until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 14:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Spreadmediaglobal per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Spreadmediaglobal. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Girth Summit (blether) 00:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ram Dhaneesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

User:@Girth Summit: blocked me as sockpuppet. Reason is edit interaction with users FluteIsDrug, Thalapathyvetrimaran, Mksudalin & Spreadmediaglobal, in articles Deri Lorus, Stephen Zechariah, Hussain Shaik Kadhar & Devendran Dave. Reason to unblock:

  1. Only article Deri Lorus create on the basis of request, but the request came among Instagram by Deri Lorus. Only one time I had created this. I will not do this mistake anymore.
  2. Other articles such as Stephen Zechariah, Hussain Shaik Kadhar, and Devendran Dave are edited by me randomly. That means in article Deri Lorus (that recently created by anonymous WikiUser) See also section- Stephen Zechariah, Hussain Shaik Kadhar and Devendran Dave is mentioned but it is in draft. Then just I moved it to main space. These edits or actions is not by switching account. Those accounts are not handled by me.
  3. Previously I handled User:தனீஷ் but after creating User: Ram Dhaneesh I didn't use the account User:தனீஷ்.
  4. You can compare my contributions and other accused users contributions for authentication. These articles is just little part of my contribution.
  5. And most important reason for unblock me is I will edit such a controversial pages anymore in my life in Wikipedia.
  6. This is my passion to be a Wikipedian.
  7. This is humble request. please unblock me. Thank you. Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 15:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declining as stale only; you may make another, hopefully more persuasive, request that addresses the concerns given. 331dot (talk) 16:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To the reviewing admin: this is not a CU block, it was based on behaviour, but I am very confident that this account is either a sock or WP:MEAT. Over the course of just a few weeks, this account got involved in at least four articles/drafts that had been created by the sockpuppeteer, including moving drafts into article space at altered titles to avoid salting. With all the AGF in the world, I cannot credit their explanation that this was just 'random' coincidence. Girth Summit (blether) 16:28, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ram Dhaneesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked as Sockpuppet of Spreadmediaglobal. Reasons for unblock me: # Previously I used only User:தனீஷ் account. That was not in use after started to use this User:Ram Dhaneesh.and I explained to then admin User:Ashleyyoursmile. But I think he is not active now. Please verify about this user. # And really I don’t know who is User:Spreadmediaglobal. Only after blocking me I know about that specific user and issues in Article Deri Lorus. Statement - sockpuppet of Spreadmediaglobal is totally fake. # Actually after blocking me only I have noticed that Deri Lorus request me to create about him in my old account User:தனீஷ். I created about him for his request me via Instagram. You can know here. I attached some screenshots of chat, about his request to create. # You can check the Contributions of Myself and that Spreadmediaglobal . There is no similarities. Because he is different user. Actually I have no idea about Creating Deri Lorus before, request from Deri Lorus. # I promise that I will not doing this again. I think this is the Only mistake that I did. Please apologize me for this time. Iam very eagerly waiting to contribute in Wikipedia in good way.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ram Dhaneesh (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Previously whe I requested for unblock, reviewer @Yamla: declined as procedural decline. And he commented that, to place the request again. And I promising to all co Wikipedians. I will not do any disruptive edits anymore. Please unblock me. I am very eager to contribute to Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 05:47, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below, this unblock request was made in bad faith. Yamla (talk) 13:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • To the reviewing admin - I have upgraded this block to a CU block; a check confirmed that this user has been evading their block through multiple accounts. Girth Summit (blether) 16:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hindu temples in Salem[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Hindu temples in Salem indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkltalk 15:04, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About unblock[edit]

Hi @Yamla: Iam Ram Dhaneesh, recently you declined my unblock request, as of procedural decline, and you mentioned that, "You are welcomed to request new unblock request" and to convince reviewing administrator, iam ready to request again, and Iam promising you that I will not edit any disruptive edits. You can check my contributions, only edits on Deri Lorus is wrong from myself, i didn't do any mistakes in future. So can you unblock me. I am ready to request again. Thanks in advance.Ram Dhaneesh (talk) 14:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Girth Summit (blether) 16:45, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #58984[edit]

is closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:11, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ram_Dhaneesh&oldid=1090827185"